Open a printable version of this page docx About The exams listed below meet the basic competency exam requirement for teacher certification in Alaska. Exams List Praxis. This means no writing score will be accepted for SAT before SAT Score reports prior to October will have "verbal" scores which are the critical reading scores.
If the score reports are from October to September , then the verbal scores are the same as the reading scores beyond Use those scores to see if the candidate has satisfied the requirement. SAT October and later score reports will have critical reading, mathematics and writing scores listed if the candidate took the tests. ACT Writing was added Feb. ACT Reading was added Oct. No ACT reading score will be accepted before Oct. ACT Writing subsection was updated and a new version was administered September Alabama WorkKeys.
Georgia Assessments for the Certification of Educators. Illinois Certification Testing System. The reading section is comprised of multiple choice questions as well as some alternate question types, such as "select in passage" responses. The writing section is comprised primarily of multiple choice questions, but also includes two essays. Often colleges use Praxis Core scores to evaluate candidates for entry into teacher preparation programs.
Candidates may register for the Praxis Core exam by mail or online, and may re-register by phone. When and how you choose to register can affect the costs and fees associated with taking the test. For more info on Praxis test registration, and suggestions on how to reduce registration costs, please click below Below is an overview of the Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators testing fees for computer-based testing. No warranty is made as to the accuracy or completeness of this information. Praxis Core computer-based testing is now offered continuously throughout the year. Please note: if you are planning to take all three Praxis Core tests on the same date, you should register for the Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators: Combined Test Not all test centers are open on all test dates, and specific registration policies and procedures may apply.
For more info on Praxis test dates and advice on choosing the best date for you, please click below Click below to visit the official Praxis testing service website Official Praxis Website. Because of this structure, candidates testing unsuccessfully for the first time in and passing in or later do not have their later successful attempts included in the analysis. Therefore, the reported eventual passing rates in Tables 5—11 through 5—14 are conservative estimates.
The Connecticut results show some of the same patterns as the California data. Minority passing rates were lower than majority passing rates on the initial and eventual administrations for both tests. The differences between African American and white candidates on the Praxis I tests increased slightly from the initial testing to the eventual testing. Although data for only a small number of tests are reported in Tables 5—7 through 5—14 , in each case they showed that minority teacher candidates had lower average scores and lower passing rates than nonminority candidates.
These differences exist on the initial attempts at licensure testing. The gaps decrease but do not disappear when candidates have multiple testing opportunities. The committee does not know how well these results generalize to those of other states. The committee contends that data on initial and eventual passing rates for minority and majority candidates should be sought from other states so that a broader picture of disparate impact on teacher licensure tests can be developed.
The differences in average scores and passing rates among groups raise at least two important questions. The finding that passing rates for one group are lower than those of another is not sufficient to conclude that the tests are biased. There are a number of factors that contribute to possible test bias: item bias, appropriateness of test content, and opportunity to learn issues.
Some researchers have found evidence of cultural bias on teacher tests that are no longer is use, especially tests of general knowledge Medley and Quirk, ; Poggio et al. These findings have led to speculation that tests which rely more heavily on general life experiences and cultural knowledge than on a specific curriculum that can be studied may unfairly disadvantage candidates whose life experiences are substantially different from those of majority candidates.
This would especially be the case if the content and referents represented on certain basic skills or general knowledge tests, for example, were more commonly present in the life experiences of majority candidates Bond, At least some developers of teacher licensure tests, though, put considerable work into eliminating bias during test construction. Items are examined for potentially biasing language or situations, and questionable items often are repaired or removed Educational Testing Service, a. Additionally, items that show unusually large differences among groups are reexamined for bias.
Items that show such differences may be removed from scoring. There is disagreement among committee members about the effectiveness of the statistical and other procedures used by test developers to reduce the cultural bias that might be present in test items. Some members worry that the procedures are not systematically applied. Other researchers have reservations about the content of pedagogical knowledge tests. They argue that expectations about appropriate or effective teaching behaviors may differ in different kinds of communities and teaching settings and that tests of teacher knowledge that rely on particular ideologies of teaching e.
Items or expected responses that overgeneralize notions about effective teaching behaviors to contexts in which they are less valid may unfairly disadvantage minority candidates who are more likely to. In addition to uneven educational opportunities, some contend that these differences may relate to differences between groups in test preparation and test anxiety Steele, At the same time, concerns have been raised that the disparities in candidate outcomes on some teacher licensing tests exceed those on other tests of general cognitive ability Haney et al.
One explanation for these larger historical differences is that there have been geographic differences in the concentrations of test takers of different groups taking particular tests and that these are correlated with differences in educational opportunities available to minorities in different parts of the country Haney et al. This hypothesis also may explain why differences among groups are much smaller on some teacher tests than on others and why the pattern for Hispanics does not necessarily follow that for African Americans. Another explanation is that minority candidates for teaching are drawn disproportionately from the lower end of the achievement distribution among minority college students.
Darling-Hammond et al. If minority candidates pass the test at a lower rate than their white peers, the public should expect that there is substantial evidence that the test and the standard represented by the passing scores that are in effect is appropriate. For example, the test should be a sound measure of the foundational skills needed for teaching, such as basic literacy skills or subject matter knowledge, that teachers need to provide instruction effectively or should accurately assess skills that make a difference in teacher competence in the classroom.
This concern for test validity should be particularly salient when large numbers of individuals who are members of historically underrepresented minority groups have difficulty passing the tests. Lower passing rates for minority candidates on teacher licensure tests mean that a smaller subset of the already small numbers of minority teacher candidates will move into the hiring pool as licensees and that schools and districts will. This outcome poses problems for schools and districts in seeking a qualified and diverse teaching force.
Currently, 13 percent of the teaching force is minority, while minority children make up 36 percent of the student population U. Department of Education, There are many reasons to be concerned about the small numbers of minority teachers Darling-Hammond and Sclan, The importance of minority teachers as role models for minority and majority students is one source of concern. Second, minority teachers can bring a special level of understanding to the experiences of their minority students and a perspective on school policies and practices that is important to include.
Finally, minority teachers are more likely to teach in central cities and schools with large minority populations Choy et al. Because minority teachers represent a relatively larger percentage of teacher applicants in these locations, a smaller pool of minority candidates could contribute to teacher shortages in these schools and districts.
There are different perspectives on whether these problems should be the focus of policy attention and, if so, what should be done about them. From a legal perspective, evidence of disparate outcomes does not, by itself, warrant changes in test content, passing scores, or procedures. While Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of says that employment procedures that have a significant differential impact based on race, sex, or national origin must be justified by test users as being valid and consistent with business or educational necessity, court decisions have been inconsistent about whether the Civil Rights Act applies to teacher licensing tests.
In two of three cases in which teacher testing programs were challenged on Title VII grounds, the courts upheld use of the tests in South Carolina and California , ruling that evidence of the relevance of test content was meaningful and sound. Both courts ruled that the tests were consistent with business necessity and that valid alternatives with less disparate impacts were not available. In the third case, Alabama discontinued use of its teacher licensing test based on findings of both disparate impact and the failure of the test developer to meet technical standards for test development.
The court pointed to concerns about content-related evidence of validity and to arbitrary standards for passing scores as reasons for overturning use of the test. These cases and other licensure and employment testing cases demonstrate that different passing rates do not, by themselves, signify unlawful practices.
The lawfulness of licensure tests with disparate impact comes into question when validity cannot be demonstrated. California, , F. The court subsequently set aside its own decision and issued a new ruling on October 30, Association of Mexican American Educators v. California, F. The committee did not consider this ruling. The disadvantages that many minority candidates face as a result of their teacher licensure test scores is not a small matter.
These disparate outcomes also affect society in a variety of ways. The committee contends that the effects of group differences on licensure tests are so substantial that it will be difficult to offset their impact without confronting them directly. To the extent that differences in test performance are a function of uneven educational opportunities for different groups, reducing disparities in the educational opportunities available to minority candidates throughout their educational careers is an important policy goal.
This will take concerted effort over a sustained period of time. The committee also believes it is critically important that, where there is evidence of substantial disparate impact, work must be done to evaluate the validity of tests and to strengthen the relationships between tests and the knowledge, skills, abilities, and dispositions needed for teaching. In these instances the quality of the validity evidence is very important.
The committee used its evaluation framework to evaluate a sample of five widely used tests produced by the Educational Testing Service. The tests the committee reviewed met most of its criteria for technical quality, although there were some areas for improvement. The committee also attempted to review a sample of National Evaluation Systems tests. Despite concerted and repeated efforts, though, the committee was unable to obtain sufficient information on the technical characteristics of tests produced by NES and thus could draw no conclusions about their technical quality.
On all of the tests that the committee reviewed, minority candidates had lower passing rates than nonminority candidates on their initial testing attempts. Though differences between the passing rates of candidate groups eventually decrease because many unsuccessful test takers retake and pass the tests, eventual passing rates for minority candidates are still lower than those for nonminority test takers. The committee concludes its evaluation of current tests by reiterating the following:.
Basic Competency Examination Requirement
The committee considers the lack of sufficient technical infor-. It is also significant because NES-developed tests are administered to very large numbers of teacher candidates. The initial licensure tests currently in use rely almost exclusively on content-related evidence of validity. It is important to collect validity data that go beyond content-related validity evidence for initial licensing tests. However, conducting high-quality research of this kind is complex and costly. Examples of relevant research include investigations of the relationships between test results and other measures of candidate knowledge and skills or on the extent to which tests distinguish candidates who are at least minimally competent from those who are not.
The processes used to develop current tests, the empirical studies of test content, and common-sense analyses suggest the importance of at least some of what is measured by these initial licensure tests. Beginning teachers should know how to read, write, and do basic mathematics; they should know the content areas they teach. The lower passing rates for minority teacher candidates on current licensure tests pose problems for schools and districts in seeking a qualified and diverse teaching force.
Setting substantially higher passing scores on licensure tests is likely to reduce the diversity of the teacher applicant pool, further adding to the difficulty of obtaining a diverse school faculty. Americans have adopted a reform agenda for their schools that calls for excellence in teaching and learning. School officials across the nation are hard at work targeting instruction at high levels for all students. Gaps remain, however, between the nation's educational aspirations and student achievement.
To address these gaps, policy makers have recently focused on the qualifications of teachers and the preparation of teacher candidates.
What is the difference between the Praxis Core Tests and the Praxis Pre-Professional Skills Test?
This book examines the appropriateness and technical quality of teacher licensure tests currently in use, evaluates the merits of using licensure test results to hold states and institutions of higher education accountable for the quality of teacher preparation and licensure, and suggests alternatives for developing and assessing beginning teacher competence. Teaching is a complex activity. Definitions of quality teaching have changed and will continue to change over time as society's values change. This book provides policy makers, teacher testers, and teacher educators with advice on how to use current tests to assess teacher candidates and evaluate teacher preparation, ensuring that America's youth are being taught by the most qualified candidates.
Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website. Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book. Switch between the Original Pages , where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.
To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter. Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available. Do you enjoy reading reports from the Academies online for free? Sign up for email notifications and we'll let you know about new publications in your areas of interest when they're released. Evaluating Current Tests.
Get This Book. Visit NAP. Looking for other ways to read this? No thanks. Suggested Citation: "5. Selecting Praxis Series Tests. Page 84 Share Cite. Selecting NES Tests.
- The Praxis I: An Overview.
- Praxis II Preparation.
- Basic Skills Assessment Requirement;
- Structural vibration: analysis and damping.
- Praxis Core!
- Handbook of maintenance management and engineering.
- Practical Statecharts in C/C++: Quantum Programming for Embedded Systems with CDROM.
Page 85 Share Cite. Page 86 Share Cite. Page 87 Share Cite. Overall Assessment of Praxis Tests. Page 88 Share Cite. Page 89 Share Cite. Principles of Learning and Teaching K-6 Test. Page 90 Share Cite. Page 91 Share Cite. Page 92 Share Cite. Page 93 Share Cite.
Page 94 Share Cite. Page 95 Share Cite.
- What is the Praxis??
- Looking for other ways to read this?.
- Living with Vulnerabilities and Opportunities in a Migration Context: Floating Children and Left-Behind Children in China.
Biology: Content Knowledge Tests, Parts 1 and 2. Page 96 Share Cite. Page 97 Share Cite. First-Time and Eventual Passing Rates.
gyqacyxaja.cf - Free, Practice Praxis Exam
Page 98 Share Cite. Data Combined Across States. Page 99 Share Cite. Page Share Cite. Page 83 Share Cite. Login or Register to save! Contents Front Matter i—xii Executive Summary 1—10 1. Introduction 11—18 2. Defining Teacher Quality 19—33 3. Testing and Licensing Beginning Teachers 34—69 4. Evaluating Current Tests 83— 6. Using Licensure Tests for Accountability — 8. Improving Teacher Licensure Testing — 9.
Stay Connected! BOX 5—4 Technical Review Synopsis Mathematics: Proof, Models, and Problems, Part 1 Test Description: Four constructed-response tasks one mathematical proof, one developing a mathematical model, two problem solving ; one-hour administration. Praxis I Examinees a. Praxis II Examinees b. SAT Math. SAT Verbal. Praxis I Examinees. Praxis II Examinees. Differences Between Whites and:.